Wed, Jul 17, 2013|Sean Goldsmith

Bernanke's market-moving words...

Why Europe's problems are much worse than the U.S...

Europe and the U.S. are facing serious fiscal issues... But there are ways for the U.S. to solve its problems.

In today's Digest Premium, Porter discusses the difference between these two economic powers... and why Europe is in deeper trouble.

To continue reading, scroll down or click here.

 Jens Weidmann, chief of Germany's central bank, the Bundesbank, recently said the European Central Bank cannot solve Europe's financial crisis...

Monetary policy has already done a lot to absorb the economic consequences of the crisis, but it cannot solve the crisis. This is the consensus of the governing council. The crisis has laid bare structural shortcomings. As such, they require structural solutions.

 You may think Europe and the U.S. are facing similar problems. But it's actually much different...

In the U.S., the federal government is functionally broke. Many states are functionally broke, too... But the structural problems we have in the U.S. could be solved politically because we have a political union.

In theory, we could decide to radically cut government spending, government pensions, and government income security programs... and we could reorder our affairs and attain solvency. Of course, I (Porter) don't expect that to happen.

 In Europe, there's no way to fix these problems because there is no political union. The eurozone is made up of 17 different nations that are all looking out for their best individual interests. Even if the people in Europe decided they wanted to roll back socialism and the size of government to become more efficient, how would they do it?

Germans don't represent the interests of Greeks. Nor do the Irish care about Spain. You have a whole different scope of problem in Europe.

 In fact, the only corollary between Europe and the U.S. is that more and more people do not pay any of the burden of the government. There's almost a "hidden Greece" inside the U.S. in terms of people who only profit from the political system and pay nothing. And of course, these people are highly unlikely to vote to ever reduce the size or spending of government.

So even though the political problems are similar in the U.S., they are not nearly as dramatic as they are in Europe. And while the U.S. is in deep trouble, it's still not as bad here as it is over in Europe...

– Porter Stansberry with Sean Goldsmith

Why Europe's problems are much worse than the U.S...

Europe and the U.S. are facing serious fiscal issues... But there are ways for the U.S. to solve its problems.

In today's Digest Premium, Porter discusses the difference between these two economic powers... and why Europe is in deeper trouble.

To subscribe to Digest Premium and access today's analysis, click here.

Bernanke's market-moving words... Resistance is futile... Where are the jobs?... Why dividend stocks are great... An elite group of stocks that could make you rich... 12% Letter subscribers are happy...

 Ben Bernanke spoke again today...

The Federal Reserve Chairman testified before Congress today at 10 a.m. Eastern time. Once again, he said nothing new. Bernanke reiterated that the Fed would taper its bond purchases at the end of the year. But everything still depends on how the economy performs.

A few sound bites from his testimony...

"With unemployment still high and declining only gradually, and with inflation running below the Committee's longer-run objective [of 2%]," he said, "a highly accommodative monetary policy will remain appropriate for the foreseeable future."

"We anticipated that it would be appropriate to begin to moderate the monthly pace of [bond] purchases later this year," Bernanke said. He said the plan is not "a preset course."

The market rose slightly following Bernanke's announcement.

 The Fed's manipulation of the money supply has kept stocks in a bull market since 2009. Its actions have boosted stocks and bonds. (Never mind that the U.S. government essentially forced its own citizens out of cash and into riskier assets.)

Now the Fed's monetary experiment is getting long in the tooth... It has shown its hand. And we all know how it will end. We're just not sure when.

 Predicting this market is a fool's game. We enjoyed the recent comments from billionaire trader Stanley Druckenmiller. Druckenmiller used to work with legendary investor George Soros before founding his own firm, Duquesne Capital. And he recently spoke out about "fighting the Fed"...

It has become harder for me, because the importance of my skills is receding. Part of my advantage is that my strength is economic forecasting. But that only works in free markets, when markets are smarter than people. That's how I started.
 
I watched the stock market, how equities reacted to change in levels of economic activity, and I could understand how price signals worked and how to forecast them. Today, all these price signals are compromised, and I'm seriously questioning whether I have any competitive advantage left.
 
Ten years ago, if the stock market had done what it has just done now, I could practically guarantee you that growth was going to accelerate. Now, it's a possibility.
 
But I would rather say that the market is rigged and people are chasing these assets, without growth necessarily backing confidence. It's not predicting anything the way it used to and that really makes me reconsider my ability to generate superior returns.
 
If the most important price in the most important economy in the world [the 10-year Treasury] is being rigged, and everything else is priced off it, what am I supposed to read into other price movements?

We agree with Druckenmiller. All we know is that an unprecedented amount of money has been pumped into the economy. In the meantime, we'll continue holding our higher-quality positions and minding our trailing stops.

 The Fed is targeting 7% unemployment. It currently sits at 7.6% (down from a high of 9.6% in 2010). But many folks question where those jobs are, including Mort Zuckerman, chairman and editor in chief of U.S. News & World Report.

Zuckerman recently wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal titled "A Jobless Recovery is a Phony Recovery." Here's an excerpt from his piece...

The jobless nature of the recovery is particularly unsettling. In June, the government's Household Survey reported that since the start of the year, the number of people with jobs increased by 753,000 – but there are jobs and then there are "jobs." No fewer than 557,000 of these positions were only part-time.
 
The survey also reported that in June full-time jobs declined by 240,000, while part-time jobs soared by 360,000 and have now reached an all-time high of 28,059,000 – 3 million more part-time positions than when the recession began at the end of 2007.
 
That's just for starters. The survey includes part-time workers who want full-time work but can't get it, as well as those who want to work but have stopped looking. That puts the real unemployment rate for June at 14.3%, up from 13.8% in May.
 
The 7.6% unemployment figure so common in headlines these days is utterly misleading. An estimated 22 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed; they are virtually invisible and mostly excluded from unemployment calculations that garner headlines.

 When the future is uncertain, entrepreneurs and businesses pull back. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently surveyed small businesses to see how they're reacting to the news. According to the report...

Small businesses expect the requirement to negatively impact their employees. Twenty-seven percent say they will cut hours to reduce full-time employees, 24 percent will reduce hiring, and 23 percent plan to replace full-time employees with part-time workers to avoid triggering the mandate.

 One of the best ways to protect yourself – and profit – through any economic environment is to own shares of high-quality companies that pay large (and often increasing) dividends.

The world's largest asset manager, BlackRock, agrees this is a winning strategy. It just released a report showing the benefit of owning these types of companies...

Dividend-paying stocks in the S&P 500 returned 2.2% annualized during such times of tightening (increasing rates), while non-dividend stocks in the S&P gained 1.8%, according to Ned Davis Research. On the other end of the spectrum, during periods of easing (declining rates) by the Federal Reserve, dividend payers gained 10.2% annualized and non-dividend payers lost 1.3%.
 
During times of neutral Fed policy is when dividend payers have performed best, returning 12.3% versus 6.2% for non-dividend stocks. There is no guarantee that stocks will continue to pay dividends.
 
The bottom line is that despite the prevailing uncertainty and volatility in financial markets, investors still need growth in their portfolios. In the new world of investing, high-quality companies that pay and grow their dividends can be wise choices.

 In his 12% Letter newsletter, Dan Ferris calls these businesses World Dominating Dividend Growers (or "WDDGs"). But the market's rally has sent Dan's WDDG stocks out of buy range, and for good reason. Buying world-class companies at good prices is one of the best – and safest – ways to get rich in the stock market.

But our colleague Frank Curzio says that if you only focus on blue-chip companies, you'll miss out on a large group of elite, small-cap dividend-payers that boast many of the same characteristics as the WDDGs.

These small-cap companies have great brand names... strong competitive advantages... steady cash flows... and impressive track records of growing their dividends. And better still, they're cheaper than most blue-chip dividend-payers.

Over the past seven months, Frank has added three of these companies to his Small Stock Specialist portfolio. They're already up an average of 10%. And in the July issue, due out tonight, he's adding another elite, small-cap dividend-payer to the portfolio.

Frank believes this company could double over the next seven years... And thanks to its growing dividend and the power of compounding, your returns could be much, much more than that over the next decade or two.

Learn how to gain access to Frank's latest pick – and get started with a risk-free subscription to Small Stock Specialist – by clicking here.

 New 52-week highs (as of 7/16/13): Fission Uranium (FCU.V), 1st United Bancorp (FUBC), Integrated Device Technologies (IDTI), and Microsoft (MSFT).

 In today's mailbag, tons of great feedback about buying and holding high-quality and high-yielding stocks... Who knew? Send us your thoughts at feedback@stansberryresearch.com.

 "Dan's 12% Letter is great. Can't compliment it enough." – Paid-up subscriber Kathi

 "I have done extremely well following his advice. I have 7 positions he recommended and am up from 15% to 35% with dividends increasing. Thanks for the methodology and teaching me how to be a better investor." – Paid-up subscriber Jim Furber

 "I would like to weigh in regarding Dan Ferris' 12% Letter dividend reinvestment philosophy. In 1987 I invested approximately $315 in HSBC, a Hong Kong based bank at the time. Around 1997, I began to reinvest the dividends in additional HSBC stock. Today, my HSBC stock is worth $8,700. Over the last twelve months, I have received dividends totaling $363. To date I am looking at just under $8,400 in capital gains and a yield of 115% on my original investment. In other words, my original investment is returned to me every 10.4 months and with every dividend increase this time-frame will be reduced.

"As part of my PWA subscription, I have been receiving the 12% Letter for about two years and have taken the DRIP philosophy to full scale. Without a doubt, this is the best investing philosophy I have ever come across (although selling options (thanks, Dr. Eifrig) takes some beating). P.S. – I sleep like a baby." – Paid-up subscriber Luke Minney

Regards,

Sean Goldsmith
Miami Beach, Florida
July 17, 2013

Why Europe's problems are much worse than the U.S...

 Ben Bernanke spoke again today...

The Federal Reserve Chairman testified before Congress today at 10 a.m. Eastern time. Once again, he said nothing new. Bernanke reiterated that the Fed would taper its bond purchases at the end of the year. But everything still depends on how the economy performs.

A few sound bites from his testimony...

"With unemployment still high and declining only gradually, and with inflation running below the Committee's longer-run objective [of 2%]," he said, "a highly accommodative monetary policy will remain appropriate for the foreseeable future."

"We anticipated that it would be appropriate to begin to moderate the monthly pace of [bond] purchases later this year," Bernanke said. He said the plan is not "a preset course."

The market rose slightly following Bernanke's announcement.

 The Fed's manipulation of the money supply has kept stocks in a bull market since 2009. Its actions have boosted stocks and bonds. (Never mind that the U.S. government essentially forced its own citizens out of cash and into riskier assets.)

Now the Fed's monetary experiment is getting long in the tooth... It has shown its hand. And we all know how it will end. We're just not sure when.

 Predicting this market is a fool's game. We enjoyed the recent comments from billionaire trader Stanley Druckenmiller. Druckenmiller used to work with legendary investor George Soros before founding his own firm, Duquesne Capital. And he recently spoke out about "fighting the Fed"...

It has become harder for me, because the importance of my skills is receding. Part of my advantage is that my strength is economic forecasting. But that only works in free markets, when markets are smarter than people. That's how I started.

I watched the stock market, how equities reacted to change in levels of economic activity, and I could understand how price signals worked and how to forecast them. Today, all these price signals are compromised, and I'm seriously questioning whether I have any competitive advantage left.

Ten years ago, if the stock market had done what it has just done now, I could practically guarantee you that growth was going to accelerate. Now, it's a possibility. But I would rather say that the market is rigged and people are chasing these assets, without growth necessarily backing confidence. It's not predicting anything the way it used to and that really makes me reconsider my ability to generate superior returns.

If the most important price in the most important economy in the world [the 10-year Treasury] is being rigged, and everything else is priced off it, what am I supposed to read into other price movements?

We agree with Druckenmiller. All we know is that an unprecedented amount of money has been pumped into the economy. In the meantime, we'll continue holding our higher-quality positions and minding our trailing stops.

 The Fed is targeting 7% unemployment. It currently sits at 7.6% (down from a high of 9.6% in 2010). But many folks question where those jobs are, including Mort Zuckerman, chairman and editor in chief of U.S. News & World Report.

Zuckerman recently wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal titled "A Jobless Recovery is a Phony Recovery." Here's an excerpt from his piece...

The jobless nature of the recovery is particularly unsettling. In June, the government's Household Survey reported that since the start of the year, the number of people with jobs increased by 753,000 – but there are jobs and then there are "jobs." No fewer than 557,000 of these positions were only part-time.

The survey also reported that in June full-time jobs declined by 240,000, while part-time jobs soared by 360,000 and have now reached an all-time high of 28,059,000 – 3 million more part-time positions than when the recession began at the end of 2007.

That's just for starters. The survey includes part-time workers who want full-time work but can't get it, as well as those who want to work but have stopped looking. That puts the real unemployment rate for June at 14.3%, up from 13.8% in May.

The 7.6% unemployment figure so common in headlines these days is utterly misleading. An estimated 22 million Americans are unemployed or underemployed; they are virtually invisible and mostly excluded from unemployment calculations that garner headlines.

 When the future is uncertain, entrepreneurs and businesses pull back. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently surveyed small businesses to see how they're reacting to the news. According to the report...

Small businesses expect the requirement to negatively impact their employees. Twenty-seven percent say they will cut hours to reduce full-time employees, 24 percent will reduce hiring, and 23 percent plan to replace full-time employees with part-time workers to avoid triggering the mandate.

 One of the best ways to protect yourself – and profit – through any economic environment is to own shares of high-quality companies that pay large (and often increasing) dividends.

The world's largest asset manager, BlackRock, agrees this is a winning strategy. It just released a report showing the benefit of owning these types of companies...

Dividend-paying stocks in the S&P 500 returned 2.2% annualized during such times of tightening (increasing rates), while non-dividend stocks in the S&P gained 1.8%, according to Ned Davis Research. On the other end of the spectrum, during periods of easing (declining rates) by the Federal Reserve, dividend payers gained 10.2% annualized and non-dividend payers lost 1.3%.

During times of neutral Fed policy is when dividend payers have performed best, returning 12.3% versus 6.2% for non-dividend stocks. There is no guarantee that stocks will continue to pay dividends.

The bottom line is that despite the prevailing uncertainty and volatility in financial markets, investors still need growth in their portfolios. In the new world of investing, high-quality companies that pay and grow their dividends can be wise choices.

 In his 12% Letter newsletter, Dan Ferris calls these businesses World Dominating Dividend Growers (or "WDDGs"). But the market's rally has sent Dan's WDDG stocks out of buy range, and for good reason. Buying world-class companies at good prices is one of the best – and safest – ways to get rich in the stock market.

But our colleague Frank Curzio says that if you only focus on blue-chip companies, you'll miss out on a large group of elite, small-cap dividend-payers that boast many of the same characteristics as the WDDGs.

These small-cap companies have great brand names... strong competitive advantages... steady cash flows... and impressive track records of growing their dividends. And better still, they're cheaper than most blue-chip dividend-payers.

Over the past seven months, Frank has added three of these companies to his Small Stock Specialist portfolio. They're already up an average of 10%. And in the July issue, due out tonight, he's adding another elite, small-cap dividend-payer to the portfolio.

Frank believes this company could double over the next seven years... And thanks to its growing dividend and the power of compounding, your returns could be much, much more than that over the next decade or two.

Learn how to gain access to Frank's latest pick – and get started with a risk-free subscription to Small Stock Specialist – by clicking here.

premium placeholder

 New 52-week highs (as of 7/16/13): Fission Uranium (FCU.V), 1st United Bancorp (FUBC), Integrated Device Technologies (IDTI), and Microsoft (MSFT).

 In today's mailbag, tons of great feedback about buying and holding high-quality and high-yielding stocks... Who knew? Send us your thoughts at feedback@stansberryresearch.com.

 "Dan's 12% Letter is great. Can't compliment it enough." – Paid-up subscriber Kathi

 "I have done extremely well following his advice. I have 7 positions he recommended and am up from 15% to 35% with dividends increasing. Thanks for the methodology and teaching me how to be a better investor." – Paid-up subscriber Jim Furber

 "I would like to weigh in regarding Dan Ferris' 12% Letter dividend reinvestment philosophy. In 1987 I invested approximately $315 in HSBC, a Hong Kong based bank at the time. Around 1997, I began to reinvest the dividends in additional HSBC stock. Today, my HSBC stock is worth $8,700. Over the last twelve months, I have received dividends totaling $363. To date I am looking at just under $8,400 in capital gains and a yield of 115% on my original investment. In other words, my original investment is returned to me every 10.4 months and with every dividend increase this time-frame will be reduced.

"As part of my PWA subscription, I have been receiving the 12% Letter for about two years and have taken the DRIP philosophy to full scale. Without a doubt, this is the best investing philosophy I have ever come across (although selling options (thanks, Dr. Eifrig) takes some beating). P.S. – I sleep like a baby." – Paid-up subscriber Luke Minney

Regards,

Sean Goldsmith

Miami Beach, Florida

July 17, 2013

Subscribe to Stansberry Digest for FREE
Get the Stansberry Digest delivered straight to your inbox.
Recent ArticlesView Full Archives
Back to Top