Buffett is still bullish on our World Dominator...
Buffett is still bullish on our World Dominator... Big news for biotech... More new highs for Steve Sjuggerud's subscribers... 'Perfect' stocks plunge...
Speaking Saturday at the 2015 Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholders meeting, Buffett said he bought "maybe 3 million" more
As we noted in the February 18 Digest, Buffett's holding company, Berkshire Hathaway, started buying more
According to Buffett's numbers, the company now owns more than 79 million shares, making
One attendee asked if IBM was a "cigar butt" company... referring to one of the biggest mistakes Buffett made early in his career. Porter explained this mistake in the October 10 Digest...
|
Porter went on to explain that Buffett used the metaphor of finding a cigar butt on the ground to describe his method in his 1989 letter to shareholders. Quoting Buffett, he wrote...
|
As Porter noted, this approach frequently caused Buffett problems, especially as his operations grew and he began to take control of companies...
|
Buffett's business partner, Charlie Munger, said that belief is wrong. He pointed out that
Buffett and Munger believe IBM will adapt again, and the latest evidence suggests they're right...
As Extreme Value research analyst Mike Barrett told us last week in the April 27 Digest, IBM is still considered an old, stodgy tech company. But it's quietly transforming into a cloud-computing products and services company...
|
When the same attendee asked why most investors don't believe this, Munger simply said, "If people weren't often so wrong, we wouldn't be so rich."
He said share buybacks can be "extremely smart or extremely dumb," depending on whether the company is buying shares back for less or more than they're worth. He said it's a simple idea... but one many companies get wrong.
Buffett said
This combination, Buffett says, is "enormously beneficial" to shareholders. He pointed out that Berkshire's stake in the company is up about 15% due to share buybacks alone.
|
As we've mentioned before,
Good news for Stansberry Venture subscribers: Spending on cancer treatment hit a record-high $100 billion last year.
According to the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics, that's a 10%-plus rise from 2013... and up more than 33% since 2009. As CNBC noted...
|
Editor Dave Lashmet has loaded his Stansberry Venture portfolio with small-cap biotech stocks that will reap huge rewards as this long-term megatrend continues.
As of yesterday's close, his first three biotech recommendations had already doubled... up 126% in less than six months, 149% in five months, and 186% in four months. It's one of the most impressive early track records we've ever seen.
Late last year, Steve called Chinese stocks "the best chance for 100% gains in the next two years." So far, his prediction has played out almost perfectly.
The Deutsche X-trackers Harvest China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) is up 96% since September. The Guggenheim China Real Estate Fund (TAO) is up 23% since August. In his True Wealth Systems advisory, the Global X China Financials Fund (CHIX) is up 27% since January.
And as you'll notice at the end of today's Digest, those three recommendations closed at new 52-week highs yesterday.
Last week, we highlighted the blowout earnings in Big Tech, specifically software giant Microsoft and consumer-products behemoth Apple.
But earnings season wasn't as rosy for social-media companies...
We already saw this play out in online-review site Yelp, whose shares fell nearly 25% in a single trading session after reporting slowing user traffic and missing revenue estimates.
Last week, social-networking site Twitter and business-focused social-networking site LinkedIn suffered the same fate.
Twitter lowered its second-quarter sales forecast. It now expects sales of $470 million to $485 million in the second quarter, significantly lower than analyst estimates of nearly $540 million.
The company also announced that revenues, while up 74%, fell short of analyst estimates. It lowered its full-year revenue guidance – which was previously $2.3 billion to $2.35 billion – to $2.17 billion to $2.27 billion.
It also reported first-quarter losses of $162 million, up from $132 million in the same period a year ago. Shares plummeted 18% last Tuesday before trading was halted for the day.
Things weren't much better for LinkedIn, whose second-quarter sales projections and annual revenue guidance were lower than analysts expected.
Analysts predicted the company's second-quarter revenue would come in around $720 million. But LinkedIn says that number will be closer to $670 million or $675 million. It also slightly lowered its revenue forecast – from $2.93 billion to $2.95 billion – to $2.9 billion.
Shares plunged 19%... the biggest one-day drop since the company went public four years ago.
Longtime Digest readers know we've been warning about the insanely high valuations of these companies. This is what happens when stocks are priced for perfection. If the company reports anything other than a "perfect" quarter, investors get crushed. We saw the same thing play out with 3D-printing firm 3D Systems last quarter.
|
New 52-week highs (as of 5/4/2015): AllianceBernstein (AB), Deutsche X-trackers Harvest China A-Shares Fund (ASHR), Blackstone Group (BX), Global X China Financials Fund (CHIX), and Guggenheim China Real Estate Fund (TAO).
In the mailbag, more subscribers respond to Porter's request on Friday. Please send your thoughts – good or bad – to feedback@stansberryresearch.com.
"Hello Porter, 'It will take two minutes' maybe to write the email but a lot longer to think through how Stansberry and my Alliance membership have enriched my life. After much thought I would say using stop losses and your teaching me about selling naked puts had the biggest impact on my results. There is so much more that I am thankful to you for but those are two of the main reasons for my improved results.
"I would, and do recommend people read your newsletters so they can learn how to achieve above average results in the market. I know your advice works and I tell people. One other thing, I took finance and my MBA back in 1978 [and] almost everything I learned back then was wrong. Thank you." – Paid-up subscriber Neil
"Right before the financial meltdown in 2007/2008, my wife and I hired a major bank to manage our investment portfolio. They put us into a lot of complex investments we didn't understand and they would do things that made no sense to us like sell a stock that was up, 362 days after it was bought for me. THEY COULDN'T WAIT 3 MORE DAYS TO SELL? Then I started looking a lot more closely at the fees and realized that as the market went down, they were still socking away fees. Big fees. Then I looked at the fees the mutual funds they had me in charged. I nearly threw up. I also fired them. I thought, 'I can do worse than them and still have more money.'
"So, here I was in 2010. I had no clue what to do with my money so I started to study and read. I also made a lot of mistakes. A couple years later, I responded to an Internet ad and subscribed to Stansberry's Investment Advisory. Soon, I was a subscriber to most of Stansberry's publications (I am now an Alliance member) and my investments are doing fine. I sleep well knowing I understand my investments, how to structure them, why I am getting into specific investments, and when to get out.
"This I learned from reading and learning from Stansberry's fine group of analysts. You won't find a sharper group anywhere. I wish them continued success because if they succeed, it is because I am succeeding." – Paid-up subscriber Charles Shapiro
"Lifetime member. Have gained a terrific knowledge of investing over the years. Your newsletters are a vast resource for all levels of investors. Glad I purchased a life-long alliance membership many years ago." – Paid-up subscriber Jack Davis
Regards,
Justin Brill
Baltimore, Maryland
May 5, 2015
