The S&A Digest: Gold: How High?

Stansberry & Associates Top 10 Open Recommendations
(Top 10 highest-returning open positions across all S&A portfolios)

As of 06/25/2013

Stock Symbol Buy Date Total Return Pub Editor
EXPERT Rite Aid 8.5% 399.00 True Income Williams
EXPERT Prestige Brands 359.90 Extreme Value Ferris
EXPERT Constellation Brands 137.80 Extreme Value Ferris
EXPERT Automatic Data Processing 117.90 Extreme Value Ferris
EXPERT BLADEX 110.10 Extreme Value Ferris
EXPERT Philip Morris Intl 101.00 Extreme Value Ferris
EXPERT Lucent 7.75% 100.30 True Income Williams
EXPERT Berkshire Hathaway 98.20 Extreme Value Ferris
EXPERT AB InBev 86.80 Extreme Value Ferris
EXPERT Altria Group 85.70 Extreme Value Ferris

Top 10 Totals
2 True Income Williams
8 Extreme Value Ferris

Gold: how high?... Canadian timber: how low?... Playing Clue with Goldman... BHP's buyback... Sjug's yen call...

How high can gold go? Our friend and currency expert Chris Weber says $2,000 is his target. Sounds high, doesn't it? Well, maybe not. According to The Wall Street Journal, the inflation-adjusted all-time high price is $2,250. That's based on the metal's 1980 spike.

The Canadian dollar (aka the "loonie") is now worth US$1.10 – a price not seen since the 1870s. That's disastrous for price-competitive Canadian exporters – like the lumber and forest product industry, for example. We sent 12% Letter editor Tom Dyson up to Canada last week to poke around. Nothing creates outstanding investment values better than a 100-year currency storm...

"Merritt must be one of the ugliest towns I've ever been to. It's surrounded by beautiful forests and snowy mountains, but the town itself looks like a sprawling trailer park in a dust bowl. Tumbleweeds blew down the streets. It would have been a good setting for a spaghetti Western. In the center of town, there is a sawmill the size of three city blocks. A huge pile of logs occupied more than half the space. 'Excess supply,' I thought to myself..."

We'll have more of Tom's discoveries later in the week.

While Canadian paper mills are hitting bottom, one of Wall Street's "paper mills" has remained strangely untouched by the mortgage crisis – Goldman Sachs. By now, you must be familiar with our argument: Like a rubber ducky floating in a toilet, Goldman's stock must soon spiral down into the cesspool of the mortgage debacle.

What might explain Goldman's curious immunity from a big mortgage-related charge against its book value? We've learned the firm is setting aside more than $16 billion for this year's bonus pool. But... how big would the bonus pool be if Goldman were to take a big ($5 billion to $10 billion) write-off before the end of the year? We don't know exactly, but we would venture to guess: several billion dollars less.

Reuters reports that if Goldman doesn't take a big loss on its mortgages, Blankfein will get a $75 million bonus this year, up $20 million from last year. Goldman's co-presidents, Gary Cohn and Jon Winkelried, will get $70 million each. It's hard to believe shareholders would agree to pay one president $70 million... and Goldman's got two of 'em! Shareholders are about to get what they deserve...

Now that we've identified Goldman's motive for masking the size of its mortgage losses, we've been searching for the weapon. How has Goldman hidden its losses, we wonder? We've been playing a game of Wall Street Clue. "It was Colonel Mustard... in the library... with the wrench..." No, it was CEO Lloyd Blankfein, in the boardroom, with illiquid bonds that can't be priced.

An entire category of financial assets (called "Level 3 assets") are so illiquid they can't be accurately priced. To make up for the lack of a true market for these assets – which include certain kinds of securitized mortgages – Wall Street uses computer models. (Reminder: When your broker starts talking about a computer model, grab your wallet.) Or, in other words, these big banks are allowed to "pick a number" for the value of these Level 3 assets. Guess which big Wall Street bank has the largest pile of Level 3 assets as a percentage of its equity? That's right, Goldman Sachs.

Inside Strategist pick BHP Billiton (BHP) said it would buy back $30 billion in shares if it wins control of iron ore producer Rio Tinto. BHP said the combined company would have "superior cash flows," and it expects annual savings of $3.7 billion a year. The buyback would be equivalent to 8% of the combined company and may increase the attractiveness of the deal by decreasing the number of shares traded.

We humbly suggest BHP Billiton's shareholders might be better served with a cash dividend, instead of a share buyback. We recall the bottom of the last commodity cycle, November 1998. Back then, oil was trading for $7 per barrel, and you could buy shares of BHP for less than $5. That was the time for a big buyback... But what did BHP's managers do in 1998? Rather than buy back 8.5% of the entire company, they paid a $0.30 per share cash dividend (6%) and repurchased a meager 2.5% of shares outstanding. Today, BHP's shares trade hands for more than $75 each.

BHP Billiton

Most management teams, like most investors, only have the desire to put capital to work in the wrong places, at the wrong times. As Barron's reported over the weekend, a new academic study discovered only about 25% of companies who actively repurchase shares perform better for investors than the S&P 500. And... most surprisingly... "The companies that used buybacks most aggressively actually generated the weakest returns over the course of the study period."

Sjug wrote it, did you buy it?

I expect that the Citibanks and the Morgan Stanleys of the world will seriously curtail their lending of Japanese yen. That means far less selling of yen, and far less buying of New Zealand dollars. The yen will stop weakening.

August 2007, Sjuggerud Confidential

The Financial Times reported today that the carry trade is indeed unwinding. The global fall in equity indexes thumped high-yielding currencies, including the Aussie and New Zealand dollars last week. Meanwhile, low-yielding currencies – like the yen, up 3.4% last week – are soaring. Steve's currency trade is working perfectly. As we've said before, don't bet against Steve when it comes to macro calls. To see what else Steve is up to, click here.

New highs: CurrencyShares Japanese Yen (FXY), Sinovac Biotech (SVA).

In the mailbag... We debate tough questions like: What's the worst thing about GM's management? Send us your thoughts – we'll read 'em: feedback@stansberryresearch.com.

"Kiplinger says you are a scammer and misquoted them."

– Paid-up subscriber Howard Bell

Porter comment: This has been discussed... in some detail... already. And guys, take it easy on poor Fred Frailey. He says you've swamped him with e-mails and cancellations. I told him I'd "call off the dogs."

"I worked as a GM engineer for 33 years, retiring in 1993. During that time I routinely resisted union offers to join the UAW. I now realize that had I joined, I would have superior healthcare benefits and security during my retirement. GM has been totally unfair to its loyal salary workers in requiring salary healthcare givebacks that are greater than it requires from its union employees. I feel betrayed by GM's management." – Paid-up subscriber Donald M. Herod

Porter comment: Imagine how the poor shareholders feel. GM's shares traded near $60 in the early 1960s... and except for a brief interlude during the year 2000 bubble... never traded higher. Now, as you know, the shares are only "worth" half that amount. So, GM is down about 50%... over 45 years. Management's performance is absurdly bad, in every respect. That GM has lost its dominant position in the U.S. market to Toyota is one of the worst corporate debacles of the last 50 years. The board of directors and the senior executives should be tarred, feathered, and run out of the country.

General Motors

"Mr. Hatfield and I have a lot in common I believe... I don't understand options at all, but I have stayed away from them." – Paid-up subscriber Ed Swiatkowski

"I'm surprised you haven't followed-up on your Synovus Financial (SNV) since your recommendation. They have announced the spin-off of (TSS), that they have an 81% ownership in, and they plan to issue about .49 shares of TSS for each share of SNV. This equates to about a $14-$15 capital spin-off value, and provides a support base of about $19 per share for purchasing Synovus. Any comments?"

– Paid-up subscriber Gary Cook

Porter comment: Not beyond that we greatly respect Sjuggerud's ability to nail these kinds of macro-driven trades. We don't know how he does it.

Regards,

Porter Stansberry

Baltimore, Maryland

November 12, 2007

Stansberry & Associates Top 10 Open Recommendations

Stock

Sym

Buy Date

Total Return

Pub

Editor

Seabridge

SA

7/6/2005

1051.9%

Sjug Conf.

Sjuggerud

Humboldt Wedag

KHD

8/8/2003

573.1%

Extreme Val

Ferris

Icahn Enterprises

IEP

6/10/2004

556.3%

Extreme Val

Ferris

Exelon

EXC

10/1/2002

321.6%

PSIA

Stansberry

EnCana

ECA

5/14/2004

248.8%

Extreme Val

Ferris

Posco

PKX

4/8/2005

206.1%

Extreme Val

Ferris

Crucell

CRXL

3/10/2004

173.7%

Phase 1

Fannon

Sangamo

SGMO

5/25/2006

170.7%

Phase 1

Fannon

Nokia

NOK

7/1/2004

164.6%

PSIA

Stansberry

Alexander & Baldwin

ALEX

10/11/2002

164.2%

Extreme Val

Ferris

Top 10 Totals

5

Extreme Value Ferris

2

PSIA Stansberry

2

Phase 1 Fannon

1

Sjug. Conf. Sjuggerud

Stansberry & Associates Hall of Fame

Stock

Sym

Holding Period

Gain

Pub

Editor

JDS Uniphase

JDSU

1 year, 266 days

592%

PSIA Stansberry
Medis Tech

MDTL

4 years, 110 days

333%

Diligence Ferris
ID Biomedical

IDBE

5 years, 38 days

331%

Diligence Lashmet
Texas Instr.

TXN

270 days

301%

PSIA Stansberry
Cree Inc.

CREE

206 days

271%

PSIA Stansberry
Celgene

CELG

2 years, 113 days

233%

PSIA Stansberry
Nuance Comm.

NUAN

326 days

229%

Diligence Lashmet
Airspan Networks

AIRN

3 years, 241 days

227%

Diligence Stansberry
ID Biomedical

IDBE

357 days

215%

PSIA Stansberry
Elan

ELN

331 days

207%

PSIA Stansberry
Back to Top