Unbelievable stats on the bond bubble...

This single metric will help you outperform the market…
In today's Digest Premium, we discuss one of the most important valuation metrics for investors to follow. If you simply buy companies that rate high on this metric, you will outperform most investors.
To subscribe to Digest Premium and access today's analysis, click here.
Unbelievable stats on the bond bubble... Investors finally moving from bonds to stocks... Is the market overvalued?... How to handle the new high in stocks... Cabin Bluff: one of the best weeks of my life...

Today's Friday Digest starts with a very important message… The stampede into stocks is about to begin.

Investors have been in cash and bonds and generally on the sidelines for a long time. But now, they're beginning to plow into stocks. While most of you consider this good news (as stock prices will surely move higher), I think it's bad news. Let me show you why...

Since the bear market of 2008 and 2009, fund inflows into stock-focused mutual funds have been weak to negative. Just look at our Stansberry's Investment Advisory money flow gauge, where we track the inflows to stock mutual funds in my newsletter each month.

When the line crosses above the "0" threshold, it means investors in the aggregate are pumping more dollars into these funds than they are withdrawing... When it's stuck below "0" – as it has been since the middle of 2011 – investors (in the aggregate) are pulling their money out of equities.

Month after month, we've seen people taking money out of stocks.

Inflows into bond funds, meanwhile, have been tremendous. And as a result, bond prices have set new records – especially lower-quality, high-yielding "junk bonds." There is no doubt that the Federal Reserve's decision to massively manipulate interest rates lower by plowing $50 billion a month into bonds has created an epic bubble.

Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have now amassed more than $30 billion in junk bonds. Investors buy ETFs rather than directly buying bonds because they can do so faster and easier. They believe (wrongly) that these ETFs offer them more liquidity. They believe they will be able to sell if they need to. They're making a huge mistake.

The junk-bond market is the most accident-prone area of the capital markets. Liquidity can dry up overnight. Information on trading is opaque at best. And even bond prices themselves can be hard to find when the market is moving. If these funds were hit with redemptions, the market would simply freeze up. Prices would literally disappear. No bid. No buyers, anywhere.

Today, bonds held by these ETFs are already paying yields more than 2% lower than comparable bonds they don't hold. That means, they've bid up the prices on the bonds they've been buying because there's so little liquidity in that market. Average prices on junk bonds are now $105.60 – an all-time high.

I can't stress this enough... investing other people's money (what ETFs do) into high-yield junk bonds… when they're trading at record-high prices... in a market where you've already outbid yourself by 200 basis points (2 percentage points)... is crazy. That's pretty much the most obvious bubble I've seen in my entire career. I don't know when that bubble will pop, but I know it will. It will be a true disaster when it does. And the trouble might already be starting.

Capital flows began favoring stocks over bonds late last year for the first time since 2009. Since November, roughly $100 billion has flowed into stock mutual funds (irrespective of withdrawals), including nearly $20 billion last week – the third-largest inflow week on record. During the same 10-week period, only $35 billion flowed into bond mutual funds.

There's no doubt that it is these new stock mutual fund inflows are pushing the stock market (particularly the large indexes) to new, all-time highs. How do I know? About half of these inflows went directly into S&P 500 index funds. The S&P 500 is a market-cap-weighted index, which means the biggest stocks carry the most weight in the index.

You see, the S&P 500 was created by Standard and Poor's, a credit ratings agency. It created the index to help sell rating services to the biggest companies in America. And so, it gave the most weight in the index to the companies that were the most likely to use its credit ratings to sell bonds to investors. The point is, the index wasn't created to help individuals manage their money. That people use it to do so is, in my view, proof-positive of willful stupidity.

Investing in the index means most of your money will go into stocks that are already the biggest and most expensive... and more and more of your money will go into these stocks as other index investors continue to bid them higher and higher without any other consideration. It makes no sense.

And yet, about half the people buying mutual funds will only buy stocks this way. As these folks re-enter the equity markets, they will send stocks much higher. And because they do not understand the first thing about successfully investing in stocks… they will literally bid up the stocks that have already gone up the most.

I've been expecting stocks to go on a tear higher. It was inevitable, given the Federal Reserve's suicidal monetary policies. Recently, legendary value investor Seth Klarman did a great job of explaining why the Fed's policy is so dangerous. The quote below is from his annual letter to the investors in his Baupost hedge fund:

[Fed Chairman Ben] Bernanke and Draghi [the head of the European Central Bank] seem intent on buying back bonds indefinitely, whether or not their actions deliver an economic recovery and in spite of any unpleasant side effects. It is clear after four years and counting that their efforts have not delivered as predicted. Only a zealot would continue on with a plan that is not working and, in defiance of reason, massively expand it... The greatest danger? How swiftly market participants have come to accept some actions as normal. What could possibly go wrong? Well, just about everything: markets distorted, future returns diminished, moral hazard snuffed out, new bubbles inflating, caution abandoned, inflation unleashed. When investors come to believe that downside tail risk has been extinguished, it emboldens them to pay higher prices, thereby accepting more risk with less return. [Emphasis added].

Look at the chart below carefully. It shows you the core valuation metrics of the S&P 500 at the various recent highs and lows.

If you're new to investing in stocks, don't let this chart scare or intimidate you. It doesn't indicate that stocks are about to crash. It simply gives you a medium-term overview of real prices.

One of the hardest things for most investors to grasp is that nominal prices, whether for individual stocks or indexes (like the S&P 500) are meaningless. Over time, inflation will push nominal prices higher. So will real economic growth and increases to earnings. Thus, the only way to actually compare values overtime is by using metrics like price-to-earnings (PE) or price-to-book-value (PB) ratios. Those numbers are displayed on this chart.

Back in 2000, stocks were in a huge bubble (just as I believe bonds are in a huge bubble today). They traded at almost 30 times earnings and for nearly five times book value. By the lows of 2009, those metrics were cut by roughly 75%. Stocks were trading at just 10 times earnings and a little more than one-and-a-half times book.

Simple question: Do you think you're more likely to do well buying a stock at 30 times earnings or at 10?

If you don't know the answer immediately, just think of it this way. Assume you were to buy the entire company. If you did, you could keep all the earnings yourself. If you bought in 2000, it would have taken you 30 years to recoup your investment, assuming earnings remained the same. By 2009, it would have only taken 10 years to recoup your investment, assuming earnings remained the same. See why it's important to buy stocks when they're cheap?

Today, the S&P 500 is basically at the same level it was in 2000 and at the top in 2007. Does that mean stocks are dangerously expensive? I don't think so. As you can see, stocks are trading for about 15 times earnings right now.

With the Fed pursuing its manic money printing and manipulating the bond market in this extreme way, I think Seth Klarman is right... Investors will come to believe that this magical money printing is going to solve all our problems. They will become more and more willing to pay higher prices for stocks. I think the inflows we're seeing right now is a sign of much bigger inflows to come. I believe the bubble in the bond market will spill over into the stock market in 2013.

Just understand... this will not end well. When the money printing finally stops, there will be hell to pay. The crashes of 2000/2001 and 2008/2009 will seem like minor blips. After all, by the time this thing really blows up, we could have record-setting bubbles in both stocks and corporate bonds.

But... for the kind of crash I expect to materialize, we're going to have a big run up in stocks first. Right now, they're not even overvalued. They're just not cheap anymore. On a valuation basis, I think stocks could easily double from here before we reach the final top I expect.

What does this mean for you? Well, I don't think it's time to sell. But I sure hope you've made some good investments already, as it's going to become extremely difficult to find reasonable values.

Most of you reading this will not heed this warning. But I believe it's my job to tell you what I'd want to know if our roles were reversed. So here it is…

At some point over the next 12-18 months, stocks will tear higher. Much higher. You'll be tempted to try and make a killing by buying stocks on margin or, even worse, buying naked call options... or perhaps putting too much money into the riskiest stocks you can find.

Don't do it. The foundations of this bull market are pure air. It will not last. If you're buying all the way up, you will get burned. For now, watch your trailing stops and enjoy the ride. But don't mistake this inflated market for a new, permanent prosperity. Others will, you can count on it. Don't follow them off the cliff.

Two more brief items. First, I'm sure many of you still don't believe that a bona-fide oil boom is underway. Perhaps you drank the "Peak Oil" Kool-Aid. Or perhaps you think it's just unlikely that enough oil can be produced to truly quench our demand for gasoline and other refined petroleum products. With oil prices back to almost $100 a barrel, you might even point the finger at me and ask, "Where's the oil glut you've been warning about?" OK... I hear you. But explain this to me...

Overall rail traffic is down compared to last year because of a reduced demand for coal and scrap steel. In total, ton-miles for U.S. railroads fell 6.1% in January, compared with last year. That's a pretty big decline.

Meanwhile, railroad stocks are soaring higher. What explains this apparent dichotomy? One figure explains everything: Rail shipments of petroleum products increased by 47.7% year over year – a truly astounding number.

I hope I don't need to explain that shipping oil from wells to refineries is a very inefficient and expensive way to move oil. Yes, it's going to take some time and some capital to exploit the new shale resources we've discovered. That's underway right now, which is one of the big reasons we've been buying energy infrastructure companies, like Chicago Bridge & Iron. It will take a few years before our economy can really capitalize on the oil boom that's underway... but it's coming.

Finally... one last personal note. (If you don't like reading about my adventures, please stop reading now.) I had one of the all-time best experiences of my life last week. I went to Cabin Bluff with a small group of close friends and a few members of the Atlas 400. One of my friends is an experienced hunter and the other is a great golfer. Cabin Bluff has some of the best quail and hog hunting in the world (on 24,000 acres of hunting grounds with more than 100 different blinds) and its totally private, Davis Love III-designed waterfront golf course. And get this... The property can only host a maximum of 40 guests.

The accommodations are luxurious, but simple… just plain cabins with private bedroom suites and beautiful stone fireplaces. The hospitality is likewise understated, but excellent. They serve three meals per day, family style. There are bars and beer coolers all over the property… help yourself. You pay a flat rate for everything. Just grab your golf clubs and play. Or schedule a guide to take you hunting. Shooting quail over good bird dogs is a joy... and you can do it all day long.

I can't recommend Cabin Bluff highly enough. I also can't wait until my sons are old enough to really enjoy it. A week of hunting, fishing, and golfing here is something I know I'll be doing once a year for the rest of my life. I liked it that much. If you're into those kinds of things, I hope you'll try it. I know you'll be impressed.

And if you'd like to share experiences like this on a regular basis, I'd encourage you to apply to my private social club, The Atlas 400. I'm always impressed by the people I meet and am able to spend time with on these trips... For example, at Cabin Bluff, I was speaking with one of our members who is the CEO of a major tech firm. He shared his views for how the technology market will expand into the next decade. Another member was telling us about a new, bottled-water company he's starting. He's secured the distribution rights for North America, China, and India for a water sourced in Eastern Europe... The water supposedly has amazing health and healing benefits.

We'd love to see you on one of our upcoming events... Later this year, we're going to Scotland to tour the best scotch distilleries, play golf, and hunt grouse. Then, we're heading to Tuscany to truffle hunt in the woods and drive Ferraris through the countryside. We're also arranging smaller, short events like a long weekend at our property in Nicaragua... And maybe a fishing trip on my boat in Miami.

You can learn more about The Atlas 400 here... Hopefully I'll see you on our next adventure.

By the way... you might wonder how a place like this was ever created in the first place. It doesn't make any sense, financially. No one trying to make a profit would have such a small, private lodge on so many acres. Nor would they build a golf course... that no one plays 99% of the time.

Cabin Bluff used to be totally private for the exclusive use of the Sea Island Co., which owned the private resort island in Georgia. The Sea Island Co.'s 2010 bankruptcy led to the opening of Cabin Bluff to the public.

Cabin Bluff is now owned by MeadWestvaco Corporation (Sea Island's former partner), which also owns almost a million acres of timber in the region. The company hides Cabin Bluff deep inside its books as "timber operations." In short... this is a rare place that doesn't exist to make a profit, but instead was created and is still used by its owners primarily for personal enjoyment.

How was the hunting? Well, I have a freezer full of quail downstairs and our group of about five boar hunters shot almost 20 pigs in three days. The largest weighed almost 200 pounds. We saw game every time we went out. Your editor/boar-killing machine is pictured below.

New 52-week highs (as of 1/31/13): Wisdom Tree Japan Total Dividend Fund (DXJ), Ericsson (ERIC), Hershey (HSY), Travelers (TRV), Blackstone Group (BX), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), Cheniere Energy (LNG), Magellan Midstream Partners (MMP), and Procter & Gamble (PG).

A light day in the mailbag… let us know how we're doing at feedback@stansberryresearch.com.

Regards,

Porter Stansberry
Miami Beach, Florida
February 1, 2013

This single metric will help you outperform the market…
In today's Digest Premium, we discuss one of the most important valuation metrics for investors to follow. If you simply buy companies that rate high on this metric, you will outperform most investors.
To continue reading, scroll down or click here.
If there is one tool individual investors should learn above all else… it's this one. I (Porter) have called it one of the most important concepts of investing and the easiest way for individuals to outperform the market…
The concept is capital efficiency.
Longtime readers have heard me discuss capital efficiency before. It's one of the core metrics I use to identify high-quality, long-term stock investments… And it's the secret behind legendary investor Warren Buffett's fortune...
Today, I want to show you how I use it to scour the market for investment opportunities. But first…
Let's review what I mean by "capital efficiency."
Capital-efficient companies generate unusually high rates of return on the capital they hold. The quintessential example of this is Coca-Cola. The soft-drink behemoth owns around $15 billion in property, plants, and equipment. It has $8 billion in long-term investments and more than $25 billion in cash and working capital. That's a total of about $48 billion in capital.
Against these assets, it can borrow roughly $48 billion (long-term debt, receivables, etc.). Coke has such a strong business and reputation, it can borrow at cheap rates… no matter the nominal level of interest rates. So Coke's real cost of borrowing (that is, after tax and after inflation) is extremely low. On a net basis, Coke runs its entire operation on only $3 billion in capital. And on this $3 billion in net capital... it produces annual cash flows in excess of $9.5 billion. That's a return of 216% on net tangible capital.
That's an astonishing rate of return… The reason Coke can manage it is because people love its drinks and will pay absurdly high prices for them…
It's a phenomenon Buffett explained in his 1983 annual letter, which I urge everyone to read. He used See's Candy as his example, but the principle applies to Coke. In explaining See's ability to consistently earn a high return on its assets (25% annually, without any leverage), Buffett wrote...
... It was a combination of intangible assets, particularly a pervasive favorable reputation with consumers based upon countless pleasant experiences they have had with both product and personnel. Such a reputation creates a consumer franchise that allows the value of the product to the purchaser, rather than its production cost, to be the major determinant of selling price.
I wrote a long essay on capital efficiency in the October 7, 2011 Digest. As I said then…
That's the whole magic. When you have a company that's able to maintain its prices and profit margins because of the value placed on the product by the purchaser rather than its production cost, you will have a business that can produce excess returns – returns that aren't explainable by rational economics. And those, my friend, are exactly the kind of companies you want to own.
My research team is constantly screening for capital-efficient companies. We hone in on three major variables – capital efficiency, return on assets (ROA), and price. Again, we measure capital efficiency by looking at how much of a company's gross profits wind up back in the pockets of shareholders via cash dividends or share buybacks. Efficiency over 40% is exceptional.
Also, we want to invest in high-class businesses with iconic brands and the likelihood of great longevity. This is impossible to quantify precisely, but a high return on assets is a good indication. It's a reflection of brand quality and a company's moat (its protection from competition). Returns on equity greater than 20% are exceptional.
When it comes to price, we prefer to pay as little as possible (obviously). But in our experience, high-quality businesses don't normally trade for much below 10 years of cash profits. We measure price by looking at a company's enterprise value (EV) – which includes the price of all its outstanding shares, plus all its net debt – and then dividing by its current annual cash earnings (EBITDA).
A warning about price... a very low price isn't always good. Some companies with very low prices (a multiple of less than five, for example) have serious problems that put future results at risk.
For example, a coal company may appear both capital-efficient and cheap, trading for less than five years of cash profits. But the market is telling us that this company probably isn't reinvesting enough in future coal reserves and that the likely lower price of coal in the future means its earnings will fall.
The coal company is a good example of why screens like this are only the beginning of the research process, not the end.
In the last issue of my Investment Advisory, we published this table, which shows the stocks that rated highest on this scale. Remember… not all of these companies are necessarily great investments… But this table is a great starting point in your search for long-term investments.
Company
Ticker
Description
Cap Efficiency* Since 2003
Average ROA Last Five Years
EV/EBITDA
Shanda Games
GAME
Chinese Internet games
41%
18
2.2
Qlogic
QLGC
Storage networking
43%
15
2.9
Strayer Education
STRA
For-profit education
37%
31
4.2
Alliance Resources
ARLP
Coal
47%
21
4.8
National Presto
NPK
Manufacturing
39%
14
5.1
Millicom
MIICF
South America wireless
54%
16
5.5
Western Union
WU
Money transfer
50%
14
5.8
Microsoft
MSFT
Software
37%
22
6.0
ExxonMobil
XOM
Oil
38%
14
6.2
Heartland Express
HTLD
Trucking
43%
12
6.8
Terra Nitrogen
TNH
Fertilizer
87%
106
6.9
Diamond Offshore
DO
Offshore O&G
47%
20
7.2
AVG Technologies
AVG
Internet security
41%
34
8.2
Southern Copper
SCCO
Copper mining
51%
24
8.3
Ubiquiti Networks
UBNT
Wireless networking
77%
53
8.7
Texas Instruments
TXN
Semiconductors
39%
17
8.7
DST Systems
DST
Info processing
84%
12
8.7
Lorillard
LO
Cigarettes
74%
35
8.9
Weight Watchers
WTW
Diet
48%
20
9.7
McDonald's
MCD
Burgers
42%
15
9.8
* Calculated as cash returned to shareholders (net of share dilution) divided by Gross Margin
– Porter Stansberry with Sean Goldsmith
This single metric will help you outperform the market…
Back to Top