Masters Series: Don't Be Fooled by the Federal Reserve's Anti-Audit Propaganda

Editor's note: As you may have heard by now, Stansberry Research has partnered with former congressman Ron Paul. Dr. Paul spent 22 years in Congress trying to rescue our country's finances.
 
Today's Masters Series essay appeared last month on the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity's website. In the essay, Dr. Paul explains why auditing the Federal Reserve is critical to restoring transparency to the U.S. economy...
 

 
Don't Be Fooled by the Federal Reserve's Anti-Audit Propaganda
By Dr. Ron Paul
 
In recent weeks, the Federal Reserve and its apologists in Congress and the media have launched numerous attacks on the "Audit the Fed" legislation. These attacks amount to nothing more than distortions about the effects and intent of the audit bill.
 
Fed apologists continue to claim that the Audit the Fed bill will somehow limit the Federal Reserve's independence. Yet neither Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen nor any other opponent of the audit bill has ever been able to identify any provision of the bill giving Congress power to dictate monetary policy. The only way this argument makes sense is if the simple act of increasing transparency somehow infringes on the Fed's independence.
 
This argument is also flawed since the Federal Reserve has never been independent from political pressure. As economists Daniel Smith and Peter Boettke put it in their paper, "An Episodic History of Modern Fed Independence," the Federal Reserve "regularly accommodates debt, succumbs to political pressures, and follows bureaucratic tendencies, compromising the Fed's operational independence."
 
The most infamous example of a Federal Reserve chair bowing to political pressure is the way former Federal Reserve Chairman Arthur Burns tailored monetary policy to accommodate President Richard Nixon's demands for low interest rates. Nixon and Burns were even recorded mocking the idea of Federal Reserve independence.
 
Nixon is not the only president to pressure a Federal Reserve chair to tailor monetary policy to the president's political needs. In the 1950s, President Dwight Eisenhower pressured Fed Chairman William Martin to either resign or increase the money supply. Martin eventually gave in to Ike's wishes for cheap money. During the 1990s, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan was accused by many political and financial experts – including then-Federal Reserve Board Member Alan Blinder – of tailoring Federal Reserve policies to help President Bill Clinton.
 
Some Federal Reserve apologists make the contradictory claim that the audit bill is not only dangerous, but it is also unnecessary since the Fed is already audited. It is true that the Federal Reserve is subject to some limited financial audits, but these audits only reveal the amount of assets on the Fed's balance sheets. The Audit the Fed bill will reveal what was purchased, when it was acquired, and why it was acquired.
 
Perhaps the real reason the Federal Reserve fears a full audit can be revealed by examining the one-time audit of the Federal Reserve's response to the financial crisis authorized by the Dodd-Frank Act. This audit found that between 2007 and 2010, the Federal Reserve committed more than $16 trillion – more than four times the annual budget of the United States – to foreign central banks and politically influential private companies. Can anyone doubt a full audit would show similar instances of the Fed acting to benefit the political and economic elites?
 
Some Fed apologists are claiming that the audit bill is part of a conspiracy to end the Fed. As the author of a book called End the Fed, I find it laughable to suggest that I, and other audit supporters, are hiding our true agenda. Besides, how could an audit advance efforts to end the Fed unless the audit would prove that the American people would be better off without the Fed? And don't the people have a right to know if they are being harmed by the current monetary system?
 
For more than a century, the Federal Reserve has operated in secrecy, to the benefit of the elites and the detriment of the people. It is time to finally bring transparency to monetary policy by auditing the Federal Reserve.
 
Regards,
 
Ron Paul
 

Editor's note: Ron Paul and Stansberry Research founder Porter Stansberry have similar ideas about what has gone wrong with America... and what's coming next.
 
Dr. Paul agrees with Porter's ideas so much that he wrote the foreword to Porter's new book, America 2020 – The Survival Blueprint. As he wrote, "This book is a must-read. I don't know of anyone who has spent as much time and money as Porter Stansberry, figuring out how to protect yourself and prosper in the years to come."
 
Right now, you can get a limited-edition copy of America 2020 – which details the exact steps you must take to prepare for America's looming currency crisis. You can learn more about this offer – and watch a video of Porter's recent conversation with Dr. Paul – right here.

Back to Top