How to Make a Lot More Money and Take a Lot Less Risk
How to make a lot more money and take a lot less risk... Why options are perfect for retirees and conservative investors... Two things every investor needs to know about the options market... P.J. O'Rourke: Five things I know about China...
Editor's note: Today, we're continuing our series with our colleague Dr. David "Doc" Eifrig...
In today's Digest, we're sharing the third and final part of an exclusive interview between Doc and Stansberry Research founder Porter Stansberry. (If you haven't already, be sure to read Part I and Part II.)
Below, Doc explains how he uses what he learned from his 10-year career on Wall Street to help his Retirement Trader subscribers earn consistent, safe income today... with less risk than buying stocks... (And be sure to read to the end for our latest installment from contributing editor P.J. O'Rourke.)

Porter: Doc, we've discussed what you learned during your time on Wall Street. How do you use these strategies in Retirement Trader? What's your goal with the service?
Doc: Well, the common goal with all of my services is to help folks build wealth safely over time.
In Retirement Millionaire, one of the ways we do this is by recommending the highest-quality blue-chip stocks... companies that are likely to remain successful for years or decades, that have a penchant for paying dividends, reinvesting earnings intelligently, and just generally treating shareholders well.
Over the long run, we can expect to make 7%-8% a year in these kinds of stocks, while taking relatively little risk.
In Retirement Trader, we're taking that idea one step further... We're using options strategies to make much higher returns – while taking even less risk – than simply buying those same stocks outright.
Using these strategies, we can expect to make 10%-12% a year over the long run in these same kinds of stocks. And again, we're taking on less risk to do it.
Porter: You've been using these strategies for several years now... You're up to well over 200 of these trades, aren't you?
Doc: Actually, we've made more than 250 trades... We're at 279 as of this week, and more than 93% of them have been winners.
Porter: So more than 90% of the time, you're making money with these trades.
Doc: Correct.
Porter: I think it's incredibly important for people to understand this...
Your Retirement Trader strategy is not at all about taking risk. That's the function when you make one of these trades, but the point of the strategy actually is to reduce risk.
This is because you're adding income to these positions over time. There may be a whole series of trades... you may have an underlying stock holding, and every three or four months, you're going to be selling an option, generating some income, and adding what I like to call "padding."
Doc: That's right. That reduces volatility, and over the long term, it can greatly increase your annualized returns.
Many folks don't appreciate the difference between making 12% a year versus making 9%. Over time, say, over five or seven years, it can make a huge difference in your total returns.
You're basically doubling your money two years or three years sooner with that kind of extra return, which makes a huge difference over three or four of those cycles. You're talking about doubling your money over and over again. That can be huge for your portfolio.
And again, I just want to stress for people who are listening, the point of the strategy is not only to increase your returns, but it is also to reduce your risk, or add that "padding" as you said...
This strategy will add a cushion so that when you end up taking a loss, it's a smaller loss. And when you end up making a profit, it's an even bigger profit.
Porter: I think this idea of maximizing your winners and minimizing your losses with options is completely lost on most people. If more folks understood it, they wouldn't be so afraid to try it.
Doc: I agree. The reason this strategy is so great for retirees should be obvious. It's much more important for retired investors to minimize their losses and maximize the income they collect.
Porter: That's true... but it's really something every investor can benefit from.
One of the things that struck me when I first met you was that I would come to you all the time and I would say, "Hey, Doc, I made this investment. Look how well it has done. I'm up 30% or 40% in six months on this stock."
And you would say, "Oh, that's great. Why don't you sell an option on it?" Your answer was always that I had made some money, but that I could make a lot more.
I kept thinking, "Why would I want to do that? What if my shares get called away?" I think that's one of the biggest hurdles for people to understand. If you sell a covered-call option on a stock that you own and you like, and your shares get called away, what have you really lost?
Doc: Just a little bit of the upside.
That's a great point. You know, it's wonderful when you can do that – when you have a good long-term investment and you're able to sell options on it every two or three months.
Again, that extra income can make a huge difference. And if a stock does get called away from you, you haven't really lost anything. You can always buy the stock again.
Porter: That was something it took me a long time to get my head around, because I was so afraid of getting called away from an investment that I loved. I wasn't thinking that I could just buy it again.
Nine times out of 10, it isn't going to get called away anyway, and you can just continue to add income.
Doc: Exactly.
Porter: Now, before we wrap this up, I want to address a couple of questions I know we'll get.
First, one of the biggest questions that we get about any kind of strategy today – whether it's stocks, bonds, or currencies – is about market risks in general.
Isn't this a risky time to be using derivatives of any kind? Isn't this a risky time to own financial assets at all?
Doc: Well, the most important thing to remember is that selling options against a diversified portfolio of high-quality stocks is going to reduce your volatility in all markets.
Of course, you and I differ a bit on our market outlook. I believe the bull market may continue a while longer.
But if you're worried about owning stocks, this is a great way to reduce your volatility – to reduce your risk of being an equity owner – without having to sell all your positions.
Porter: One other common question we get is how much money and what kind of experience investors need to have to really put this strategy to work.
Doc: Well, it depends.
If you're younger and still working, or if you have a substantial income, then you could really start trading with as little as $2,000, which is typically the minimum to open up a brokerage options account. And for these folks, it can be an interesting way to get into the stock market.
But for most investors – particularly retirees and those who have a fixed amount of capital – I think investors should really have at least $50,000 to use this strategy.
Porter: I agree. In fact, I would take that a step further...
I don't think anyone who has less than $50,000 should even be buying individual stocks... and I certainly don't think anyone with less than $50,000 should be trading options.
This is just my opinion, but if you lack the fortitude and the discipline to save $50,000, then you are unlikely to be successful in the markets.
People have a tendency to greatly underestimate the amount of discipline and emotional reserve required to be successful in any trading strategy.
The people who are the most successful in the markets are the people who can be completely objective about their money. And if you have a hard time even saving money, it's probably not going to work out well for you. I would rather avoid being a part of that catastrophe.
Doc: That's a good point. Just practically speaking, if you have less than $50,000, it will be much more difficult to diversify appropriately and maximize the benefits of the strategy.
Porter: Before we finish, I'd like to quickly review...
Listening to what you've said, one of the big advantages you have as an analyst is that you spent a lot of time in professional finance.
You have the training of business school... you have the experience working on the derivatives trading desk at Goldman Sachs... you've designed options... you've taught them to other professionals... and you have a decade of professional Wall Street experience.
And of course, you have plenty of personal experience as well... You've sold options on your own accounts when you were managing some capital for your family.
So you've seen it from all different angles, from "inside the sausage factory," to being an actual practitioner, to being an investment principal, and now to being an outside third-party independent analyst for individual investors.
Looking back at all this knowledge and having all these experiences, what's the most important thing you want people to know about the options market?
Doc: There are two things, really. Options are probably the best way to begin your investment portfolio – again, assuming you've saved enough capital – because it's a less risky way to buy stocks compared with simply buying them directly. I hope that's clear.
Even more important today, I think options are the best way to reduce risk and add income to a long-term equity portfolio.
Right now, it's harder than ever for investors to make a reasonable annual yield. Where can you go if you need to generate 10% a year from your portfolio – on top of your Social Security payments – just to survive?
Are you going to go out and buy bonds that are yielding 10%? Good luck. You're likely to get wiped out.
You could go out and try to buy growth stocks and hope to make 10% a year in capital gains. If you're lucky and choose correctly, that might work... But if you bought Twitter (TWTR) or GoPro (GPRO), look out.
You know I love blue-chip stocks over the long run, but you would have made maybe 2% last year in total returns. If you need income to live on right now, that isn't going to work.
The one area of the market that still offers you low risk and high yield today is the kind of options-selling for income we do in Retirement Trader.
If you're in that position, I urge you to learn more. I'll be hosting a free educational webinar next Wednesday, January 20 at 8 p.m. Eastern time. I hope you'll join me.
Porter: Thank you very much, Doc.
Doc: Thanks, Porter.

Editor's note: If you would like to learn more about Doc's strategy, be sure to attend his free, online training event next Wednesday, January 20 at 8 p.m. Eastern time.
Again, this education is absolutely free... Doc just asks all interested readers to sign a short pledge to prove they're serious about learning this strategy. Click here to reserve your spot now.
New 52-week highs (as of 1/13/16): short position in Capital One Financial (COF), short position in iShares MSCI Canada Index Fund (EWC), short position in Santander Consumer USA (SC), short position in Suncor Energy (SU), and short position in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Fund (XOP).
In today's mailbag, more praise for Retirement Trader, and one subscriber has a question about Doc's upcoming webinar. Do you have questions for Doc? Let us know at feedback@stansberryresearch.com. And please continue to send us your experiences with trading options for income.
"I started out reading Porter's Option newsletter way back when. I've been an Alliance member now for about 6 years, and sorry Porter, but it took Doc to make the options 'lightbulb' really come on. I started off small, a simple goal of getting $100 a month for 'beer and pizza.' That was easy enough to accomplish so I set my goal at $500... then $1,000. I'm here to say, it can be done... and if I can do it anyone can! Now I pretty much come up with my own trades, but I also read DailyWealth Trader and Retirement Trader at every issue. Over the past three years I have consistently scored 'single and double' winners to the tune of between 85%-90% of my trades. It'd probably be closer to 90% all the time if I could resist the stupid urge to purchase an option every once in awhile. (I've thought about seeing if I could attend some 'Buyer's Anonymous' group, to get some help with this!)
"Porter, as for trying to get others to 'drink the water'... believe me I've tried to get many of my friends interested in such a successful trading method. But time and time again all I get is 'deer in the headlight' stares. To my great surprise, I have yet to find anyone willing to invest a minimum amount of time to learn options! I just don't get it! Have no fear Porter & Doc... you keep writing and I'll keep reading. You're quite the teachers!" – Paid-up subscriber Gary R.
"Hi Doc, What is the minimum investment required before I sign your pledge? Thanks." – Paid-up subscriber Roy B.
Brill comment: As Doc explained above, his Retirement Trader service is best suited for investors with $50,000 or more to invest. If you don't have at least that much, it likely won't be a good fit for you right now. To learn more about Doc's pledge, click here.
On the other hand, we have heard from several satisfied Retirement Trader subscribers who have less than $50,000 and signed up not for Doc's trading recommendations, but for the education. They consider their subscription fees to be "tuition," and they're learning how to trade while they save the necessary capital.
We've never marketed Doc's service that way, but we aren't surprised... Doc doesn't just recommend safe options trades, he shows his readers how they can make those same kinds of trades for themselves.
Regards,
Justin Brill
Baltimore, Maryland
January 14, 2016

Five Things I Know About China
By P.J. O'Rourke
Everybody's worried about China. Its economic situation is complicated. But China isn't "The Mysterious East." It isn't impossible to understand.
A few years ago, I traveled around China with two savvy companions, looking at the fabric of the Chinese economy and the nuts and bolts of China's economic growth.
I mean "fabric" and "nuts and bolts" literally. We spent our time at textile mills, steel mills, manufacturing plants, and clothing factories.
I was with old friends from Hong Kong – Tom, an engineer who has been in the steel business on the Chinese mainland for 30 years, and Tom's wife Mai, a Hong Kong native fluent in English, Cantonese, and Mandarin.
When China began adopting some aspects of capitalist economics in the 1980s – a shift known as the "Open Door" policy – Mai and her brothers started a textile machinery brokerage firm.
Mai's job was to take mainland start-up entrepreneurs to Europe (where they encountered their first fork, escalator, etc.) and arrange for them to purchase used spinning, weaving, and dyeing equipment from the faltering textile companies of Belgium and France.
The three of us journeyed to Shanghai, Hangzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi, up the Yangtze River through the Three Gorges to Chongqing, north to Xi'an and Shaanxi Province, and south to Guangzhou.
I came back from China optimistic about its future. And I'm still optimistic. But even at the height of China's growth boom, I felt what might be called "alert" optimism. An investor in China needs to be wide awake, with good information, solid advice, patience, an eye on the nation's complex (and sometimes self-contradictory) political system, and insights about the nature of the people and enterprises that will make China grow.
To me, five things about China were clear:
1. The Chinese are more like Americans than anybody, including some Americans.
As entrepreneurs, the Chinese aren't just sharp, they're sharp-eyed. They see opportunity where others see disaster.
One gentleman I met – let's call him "Mr. Chen" (I've changed the names of the people I interviewed) – was a polyester-fleece magnate. He got his start as a soldier looking at Russian corpses during the 1969 Sino-Soviet border clash along the frozen Amur River.
He noticed the Russians had synthetic fabrics that were lighter and warmer than the fur the Chinese troops wore.
Mr. Chen knew nothing about textiles, but he convinced senior officers to let him start a small military research project.
When China went capitalist, Mr. Chen used his research to build a fleece business. The People's Liberation Army not only gave him permission, it even provided financing.
By the time I met Mr. Chen, his textile mills were rolling out miles of fleece for clothing makers around the world.
But the secret to American-style capitalism is not only the success of good ideas, it's also the failure of bad ideas. Resilience is needed.
David, the tour guide on our boat trip up the Yangtze, was the son of a truck driver. In the 1980s, the government trucking company began allowing drivers to lease trucks for 10% of the profits.
David's mother scolded David's father for giving up his safe government job to lease a truck. But David's father made $2,000 a year. "We had the first refrigerator in our neighborhood," David said.
Then David's family invested in the new, poorly regulated, easily manipulated Shanghai Stock Exchange. Bad idea. They lost everything.
"They moved to a small village and worked all day and all night to start a tourist resort," he said. "Now they are prosperous again."
The Chinese work hard and play hard. I asked Mai why there weren't many mainland Chinese on our cruise up the Yangtze. "They cruise down the Yangtze," she said. "It's three days instead of four, so they can have their fun faster. Mainlanders are always in a hurry."
And mainlanders also don't stint on hospitality. Tom and Mai's business friends outdid each other with umpteen-course meals. Tom calls it "death by banquet."
The Chinese like beer, wine, whiskey, and throat-searing maotai sorghum brandy, and serve them all at the same time. You don't sip your drink in China. It's gan bei ("bottoms up") no matter the size of the glass.
The Chinese like to laugh. After four or five gan bei toasts at a banquet in Shanghai, Mr. Lui, a real-estate developer, criticized America's involvement in Afghanistan.
I assumed we were talking politics and began mumbling nonsense that sounded like John Kerry.
"Don't talk politics," said Mr. Liu. "Talk price. What do you spend on the war in Afghanistan? Maybe $300 billion? Maybe $400 billion?"
In fact, the total, so far, is almost $900 billion.
"Afghanistan has a $20 billion GDP," said Mr. Liu. "Has your president never heard of a P/E ratio? Why didn't he buy the country from the Taliban?"
And China has an American frontier egalitarianism. Every dinner included the business leader's secretaries, aids, assistants, and drivers, seated at the same table and eating, drinking, and talking with equal gusto. (Although the drivers were excused from gan bei.)
2. China is a frontier.
The wilderness begins just a few miles outside the cities. Although it's an economic wilderness. I didn't see any forests or prairies or wild animals.
A coal, coke, and iron-ore broker from Xi'an, Mr. Tian, took me on a 150-mile trip to show off the coke oven he had built in rural Shaanxi Province.
Except for a few high-tension wire towers and the highway, we saw what Marco Polo saw. Every bit of land was terraced to the hilltops. Even in burial grounds crops grew right up to the gravestones.
The power from the power lines didn't reach the tiny villages, nor did the pavement or any water pipes. Goats, sheep, and pigs were few.
Mr. Tian grew up in one of these villages. China's subsistence agriculture, he said, doesn't produce the surplus needed to support domestic animals.
Average annual income in rural China is about $620. Half of China's population is rural.
3. China is still poor.
This is good for investors. It shows how much growing China has left to do.
China's $10.4 trillion economy seems huge – until you divide it by its 1.3 billion people.
China's per-capita GDP is $13,224. Botswana's is $17,050.
China's government claims the average wage is $8,575 a year. But it seems to be a struggle to get a job with "average" pay.
In China's booming coastal cities, I heard about foreign workers and illegal immigrants. But I didn't see any workers who looked foreign, except a few well-heeled expats.
Government permission is, technically, still needed to change your place of residence in China. The "foreign" illegal immigrants were from the China's own countryside.
The official minimum wage in China is $3,618 a year. For a Chinese family of four to reach the U.S. poverty line of $23,283, three adults would have to be working two full-time minimum wage jobs each, plus overtime.
A few figures tell the story. But a look out the car window in Shaanxi told it better.
4. China's economic base is primitive.
This is not good for investors. Because the problem is not old-fashioned machinery or out-of-date technology. The problem is a primitive, authoritarian, deeply corrupt, and highly arbitrary politico-economic system that lingers in China.
China's new factories were built with foreign capital to produce foreign exports. There's another side to Chinese manufacturing.
Tom took me to a Mao-era steel mill that his company bought from the Chinese government for $1, on the condition that Tom keep it operating.
The machinery was old-fashioned. Sir Henry Bessemer, who invented the Bessemer converter to mass-produce steel in 1856, would recognize every part of the mill.
What would have baffled Sir Henry was the 2,000 workers Tom had to fire because they weren't doing any work. Not to mention the 300 "ghost workers" who were on the mill's payroll and didn't exist at all.
The mill's workforce is now smaller than the number of ghosts it used to employ.
Tom had to cope with labor unrest. As we were climbing the tower to the blast furnace, Tom said, "Here's where a guy threw a wrench at me."
"What did you do?" I asked. Tom was wearing an Armani suit now, but he had been a Ranger in Vietnam.
"I knocked him down the stairs," Tom said. "After that, I got along fine with the workers."
There was also a family in the nearby village that, by tradition, had "theft rights" at the mill. They stole a railroad train full of iron ore. Tom caught them by following the train tracks.
Tom bought a 150-pound guard dog from the People's Liberation Army. Shasha ("Killer") was still there, delighted to see Tom and wagging a tail that could drive railroad spikes.
Tom's longest-running difficulty came from a mill hand having an affair with a woman working at the chemical factory next door. They got together in an electrical equipment closet. Midst throes of passion, the mill hand backed into high-voltage circuitry and was electrocuted. (His girlfriend survived – with her hair a bit frizzier than is usual in China.)
The mill hand's widow brought her entire ancestral village to block the steel mill's gates. As compensation for her husband's death, she demanded his salary in perpetuity, a job for their mentally disabled daughter, a new house, and payment of her husband's gambling debts.
"I had to call in the Communist party officials," Tom said.
"Did they ship her and her village to a prison camp?" I asked.
"They didn't do anything. They said it was my problem. I finally settled with the widow for a couple hundred bucks."
5. China has a lot of history.
Some of it is good. British scientist, historian, and China expert Joseph Needham maintained that from the first century B.C. to the 15th century A.D., China was the most prosperous and technologically advanced country on earth.
Then, progress stopped for 500 years. The reason was the authoritarian, deeply corrupt, and highly arbitrary politico-economic system.
After the fall of the Qing Dynasty in 1911, China didn't recover. Instead, the Chinese communists imposed a whole new authoritarian, deeply corrupt, and highly arbitrary politico-economic system.
Lately, progress has been rapid. China's per-capita GDP in 1980 was $310. But the most important thing I learned in China is that no matter how entrepreneurial individual people are in China, and no matter how energetically their enterprises are run, there are powerful forces remaining that can hold back the country's maximum potential for real growth.
In Guangzhou, I talked to Phillip, an American who moved to China to restore the antique furniture that had been wrecked and neglected by the communists, and build reproductions using the original types of wood, tools, and finishes.
He showed me his workshop where he runs a training program for young Chinese cabinetmakers.
Phillip said, "After a couple of generations when no one cared about craftsmanship, the craftsmanship is amazing."
I watched a young man making an intricate dovetail joint. Phillip explained that European cabinetry has five principal types of dovetail joints. But Chinese cabinetry has more than 40.
The young man was cutting the dovetail with a hatchet – a hatchet an American Boy Scout would use to split kindling while slicing off a toe.
Phillip said, "There is, however, a Chinese tendency to do things the hard way."
Regards,
P.J. O'Rourke
|